Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published April 1981 | public
Journal Article

The actin genes of drosophila: Protein coding regions are highly conserved but intron positions are not

Abstract

The entire set of six closely related Drosophila actin genes was isolated using recombinant DNA methodology, and the structures of the respective coding regions were characterized by gene mapping techniques and by nucleotide sequencing of selected portions. Structural comparisons of these genes have resulted in several unexpected findings. Most striking is the nonconservation of the positions of intervening sequences within the protein-encoding regions of these genes. One of the Drosophila actin genes, DmA4, is split within a glycine codon at position 13; none of the remaining five genes is interrupted in the analogous position. Another gene, DmA6, is split within a glycine codon at position 307; at least two of the Drosophila actin genes are not split in the analogous position. Additionally, none of the Drosophila actin genes is split within codon four, where the yeast actin gene is interrupted. The six Drosophila actin genes encode several different proteins, but the amino acid sequence of each is similar to that of vertebrate cytoplasmic actins. None of the genes encodes a protein comparable in primary sequence to vertebrate skeletal muscle actin. Surprisingly, in each of these derived actin amino acid sequences the initiator methionine is directly followed by a cysteine residue, which in turn precedes the string of three acidic amino acids characteristic of the amino termini of mature vertebrate cytoplasmic actins. We discuss these findings in the context of actin gene evolution and function.

Additional Information

© 1981 by MIT. Received 24 November 1980, Revised 23 January 1981. e are grateful to Drs. Randy Robinson, Pauline Yen, Jerry Dodgson and David Kaback for technical advice and to Dr. Karen Kindle for purifying phage DNAs. We thank Drs. John Abelson, William Crain. Richard Firtel, Mary Schuler and Sally Tobin for communicating results prior to publication. This work was supported by research grants from the NIH. EAF was supported by an NIH Postdoctoral Fellowship and BJB and KSM by an NIH predoctoral training grant. Biosafety: This research was carried out in accordance with NIH Guidelines, using PP/EK1 containment. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023