Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published May 2019 | Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

Three-Dimensional Basin and Fault Structure From a Detailed Seismic Velocity Model of Coachella Valley, Southern California

Abstract

The Coachella Valley in the northern Salton Trough is known to produce destructive earthquakes, making it a high seismic hazard area. Knowledge of the seismic velocity structure and geometry of the sedimentary basins and fault zones is required to improve earthquake hazard estimates in this region. We simultaneously inverted first P wave travel times from the Southern California Seismic Network (39,998 local earthquakes) and explosions (251 land/sea shots) from the 2011 Salton Seismic Imaging Project to obtain a 3‐D seismic velocity model. Earthquakes with focal depths ≤10 km were selected to focus on the upper crustal structure. Strong lateral velocity contrasts in the top ~3 km correlate well with the surface geology, including the low‐velocity (<5 km/s) sedimentary basin and the high‐velocity crystalline basement rocks outside the valley. Sediment thickness is ~4 km in the southeastern valley near the Salton Sea and decreases to <2 km at the northwestern end of the valley. Eastward thickening of sediments toward the San Andreas fault within the valley defines Coachella Valley basin asymmetry. In the Peninsular Ranges, zones of relatively high seismic velocities (~6.4 km/s) between 2‐ and 4‐km depth may be related to Late Cretaceous mylonite rocks or older inherited basement structures. Other high‐velocity domains exist in the model down to 9‐km depth and help define crustal heterogeneity. We identify a potential fault zone in Lost Horse Valley unassociated with mapped faults in Southern California from the combined interpretation of surface geology, seismicity, and lateral velocity changes in the model.

Additional Information

© 2019 American Geophysical Union. Received 21 JUN 2018; Accepted 6 APR 2019; Accepted article online 11 APR 2019. We thank three anonymous reviewers, the Editor in Chief, Uri ten Brink, and the Associate Editor, Kelly Liu, for their comments and suggestions, which significantly improved this manuscript. The SSIP was funded by the U.S. Geological Survey Multihazards Demonstration Project, and the National Science Foundation Earthscope and Margins Programs through grants OCE‐0742253 (to California Institute of Technology) and OCE‐0742263 (to Virginia Tech). This research was supported by Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) awards 15190 and 18074 and the U.S. Geological Survey grant G15AP00062. SCEC is funded by NSF Cooperative Agreement EAR‐1033462 and USGS Cooperative Agreement G12AC20038. The SCEC contribution number for this paper is 8269. R. A. was also financially supported by the Society of Exploration Geophysicists Foundation through the merit‐based scholarship program. We refer to the extensive acknowledgments in Rose et al. (2013) for permissions and assistance received for SSIP as a whole. The data have been archived at the IRIS DMC (ds.iris.edu/pic‐ph5/metadata/SSIP/form.php). The 3‐D velocity model as well as the derived basement and estimated Z_(2.5) surfaces important for seismic hazard assessment is available for download at our LSU research webpage (https://www.geol.lsu.edu/persaud/Data.html). All figures are plotted using the Generic Mapping Tools (Wessel et al., 2013).

Attached Files

Published - Ajala_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Solid_Earth.pdf

Supplemental Material - jgrb53421-sup-0001-2018jb016260-s01.docx

Files

Ajala_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Solid_Earth.pdf
Files (14.0 MB)

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023