Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published November 2014 | Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

Claim Validation

Abstract

Hume (1748) challenged the idea that a general claim (e.g. "all swans are white") can be validated by empirical evidence, no matter how compelling. We examine this issue from the perspective of a tester who must accept or reject the forecasts of a potential expert. If experts can be skeptical about the validity of claims then they can strategically evade rejection. In contrast, if experts are required to conclude that claims backed by sufficient evidence are likely to be true, then they can be tested and rejected. These results provide an economic rationale for claim validation based on incentive problems.

Additional Information

© 2014 American Economic Association. We thank three anonymous referees for many useful suggestions. We also thank Wojciech Olszewski, Eran Shmaya, Marciano Siniscalchi, and Rakesh Vohra for useful discussions, and seminar audiences at the Canadian Economic Theory Conference 2012, the Fifth Transatlantic Theory Workshop, the Summer meeting of the Econometric Society 2012, XIII Latin American Workshop in Economic Theory, Jolate conference in Bogota, and the Washington University seminar series. Sandroni gratefully acknowledges financial support from the National Science Foundation. All errors are ours.

Attached Files

Published - claim_validation.pdf

Supplemental Material - 20130516_app.pdf

Supplemental Material - 20130516_ds.zip

Files

20130516_app.pdf
Files (478.0 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:f696f4a2ceac3c9d484cbba58dfdc9ba
152.2 kB Preview Download
md5:dbe6ad713105c86516f2432cc006ce13
226.1 kB Preview Download
md5:9eb760165f48ffeacf6e966bee2ecf9f
99.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023