Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published February 18, 2019 | Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Microtubule End-Clustering Maintains a Steady-State Spindle Shape

Abstract

Each time a cell divides, the microtubule cytoskeleton self-organizes into the metaphase spindle: an ellipsoidal steady-state structure that holds its stereotyped geometry despite microtubule turnover and internal stresses [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Regulation of microtubule dynamics, motor proteins, microtubule crosslinking, and chromatid cohesion can modulate spindle size and shape, and yet modulated spindles reach and hold a new steady state [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. Here, we ask what maintains any spindle steady-state geometry. We report that clustering of microtubule ends by dynein and NuMA is essential for mammalian spindles to hold a steady-state shape. After dynein or NuMA deletion, the mitotic microtubule network is "turbulent"; microtubule bundles extend and bend against the cell cortex, constantly remodeling network shape. We find that spindle turbulence is driven by the homotetrameric kinesin-5 Eg5, and that acute Eg5 inhibition in turbulent spindles recovers spindle geometry and stability. Inspired by in vitro work on active turbulent gels of microtubules and kinesin [12, 13], we explore the kinematics of this in vivo turbulent network. We find that turbulent spindles display decreased nematic order and that motile asters distort the nematic director field. Finally, we see that turbulent spindles can drive both flow of cytoplasmic organelles and whole-cell movement—analogous to the autonomous motility displayed by droplet-encapsulated turbulent gels [12]. Thus, end-clustering by dynein and NuMA is required for mammalian spindles to reach a steady-state geometry, and in their absence Eg5 powers a turbulent microtubule network inside mitotic cells.

Additional Information

© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. Received 26 July 2018, Revised 26 November 2018, Accepted 8 January 2019, Available online 7 February 2019. We thank Andrea Serra-Marques and Josh Guild for experimental assistance and advice, Iain Cheeseman and Kara McKinley for key reagents and advice, Nigel Orme for Figure S2H visualization, and Justin Bois, Jan Brugués, Zvonimir Dogic, Sebastien Fürthauer, Mike Hagan, Jané Kondev, Dan Needleman, the Fred Chang Lab, and the Dumont Lab for wonderful discussions. Special thanks to the Marine Biological Laboratory Physiology course and MBL post-course research support from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. This work was supported by NIH DP2GM119177 (S.D.), the Searle Scholars Program and Rita Allen Scholars Program (S.D.), NSF 1548297 to the Center for Cellular Construction (S.D.), an NIH NRSA F31 (C.L.H.), the UCSF Moritz Heyman Discovery Fellowship (C.L.H.), NIH 1R35 GM118043-01 (R.P.), and the John Templeton Foundation as part of the Boundaries of Life Initiative grants 51250 and 60973 (R.P.). Author Contributions: Conceptualization, C.L.H., R.P., and S.D.; Investigation, C.L.H. and M.A.; Formal Analysis – C.L.H. and V.G.; Visualization – C.L.H. and V.G.; Writing – Original Draft, C.L.H.; Writing – Review & Editing, C.L.H., V.G., R.P., and S.D.; Funding Acquisition, C.L.H., R.P., and S.D.; Supervision, R.P. and S.D. The authors declare no competing interests.

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - 1-s2.0-S0960982219300181-mmc1.pdf

Files

1-s2.0-S0960982219300181-mmc1.pdf
Files (4.5 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:2a53cd5cc9a08b628aa4e1b76931b0cb
4.5 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023