Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published January 22, 2019 | Published
Journal Article Open

Mission-driven research for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering

Abstract

The last decade has seen broad exploratory research into stratospheric aerosol (SA) geoengineering, motivated by concern that reducing greenhouse gas emissions may be insufficient to avoid significant impacts from climate change. Based on this research, it is plausible that a limited deployment of SA geoengineering, provided it is used in addition to cutting emissions, could reduce many climate risks for most people. However, "plausible" is an insufficient basis on which to support future decisions. Developing the necessary knowledge requires a transition toward mission-driven research that has the explicit goal of supporting informed decisions. We highlight two important observations that follow from considering such a comprehensive, prioritized natural-science research effort. First, while field experiments may eventually be needed to reduce some of the uncertainties, we expect that the next phase of research will continue to be primarily model-based, with one outcome being to assess and prioritize which uncertainties need to be reduced (and, as a corollary, which field experiments can reduce those uncertainties). Second, we anticipate a clear separation in scale and character between small-scale experimental research to resolve specific process uncertainties and global-scale activities. We argue that the latter, even if the radiative forcing is negligible, should more appropriately be considered after a decision regarding whether and how to deploy SA geoengineering, rather than within the scope of "research" activities.

Additional Information

© 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Published under the PNAS license. Edited by John H. Seinfeld, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, and approved November 21, 2018 (received for review June 26, 2018). PNAS published ahead of print January 7, 2019. The ideas presented herein have been developed over many years in conversations with many different researchers. In particular we thank Tom Ackerman, Holly Buck, Jane Long, Michael Mills, Ted Parson, Phil Rasch, Jadwiga Richter, Michael Thompson, Simone Tilmes, Kelly Wanser, and two anonymous reviewers. This work was supported by the Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future at Cornell University (D.G.M.). The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for the US Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. Author contributions: D.G.M. and B.K. designed research, performed research, and wrote the paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Attached Files

Published - 1089.full.pdf

Files

1089.full.pdf
Files (730.2 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:4fcd1422fe180b4aac820a58c1c38868
730.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 19, 2023