Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published September 2018 | Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

A New Workflow to Assess Emplacement Duration and Melt Residence Time of Compositionally Diverse Magmas Emplaced in a Sub-volcanic Reservoir

Abstract

Construction durations of magma reservoirs are commonly inferred from U–Pb zircon geochronology using various statistical methods to interpret zircon U–Pb age spectra (e.g. weighted mean ages of concordant zircon populations). However, in compositionally different magmas, zircon saturation and crystallization are predicted to occur at different times relative to other mineral phases and the geological event of interest; for instance, magma emplacement. The timescales of these processes can be predicted by numerical modeling and measured using U–Pb zircon thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) geochronology, therefore creating an opportunity to quantify magma emplacement in space and time to constrain the size and longevity of magma reservoirs during pluton construction. The Jurassic tilted, bimodal (gabbroic and granitic) Guadalupe igneous complex (GIC) in the Sierra Nevada arc presents an exceptional opportunity to study the construction duration of a shallow (1–10 km) magma reservoir comprising multiple magma batches. We present a new workflow to constrain emplacement ages from zircon geochronology of compositionally different magma batches and evaluate melt-present timescales. High-precision U–Pb chemical ablation isotope dilution (CA-ID)-TIMS zircon ages are combined with MELTS modeling to calculate zircon saturation ages for each dated sample. Bayesian statistics are then used to compare calculated zircon saturation distributions with zircon age distributions from TIMS data to predict time, temperature, and melt fraction at zircon saturation and solidus. In addition, we use mineral thermometry and cooling rate calculations to relate zircon saturation ages to emplacement ages for felsic and mafic rocks, resulting in a best estimate for the total construction duration of 295 ± 110 kyr for the GIC. Rhyolites exposed at the top of the GIC are ∼2–3 Myr older and thus not part of the same magmatic system. The good agreement between Ti-in-zircon crystallization temperatures and calculated zircon saturation temperatures by MELTS implies that bulk-rock compositions of both mafic and felsic rocks are close to liquid compositions. Mafic and felsic magmas experienced extensive mingling at the emplacement level in a magma chamber (which, as defined here, has temperatures above the solidus of the respective rock composition) encompassing ∼60% of the exposed map area of the complex shortly after construction. Melt was present within the system for a total duration of ∼550 kyr as constrained by two-dimensional thermal finite-difference modeling using an incremental growth and sill emplacement model. The construction and melt-present timescales calculated in this study for the shallow GIC have implications for the potential of in situ differentiation, mixing and mingling timescales and eruption in shallow magmatic systems.

Additional Information

© The Author(s) 2018. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Received August 23, 2017; Accepted August 2, 2018. Katie Ardill is thanked for help with microprobe work at the USGS facility at Menlo Park. The authors thank Peter Nabelek for sharing the SILLS code for conductive cooling calculations. Rosario Esposito at UCLA and Leslie Hayden at the USGS are thanked for helping with microprobe work, and Andrew Kylander-Clark for work on LA-ICP-MS at UCSB. We further thank Cal Barnes for comments on an earlier version of this paper, which helped to improve it. The authors further thank Jonathan Miller and two anonymous reviewers for their comments and feedback, which helped to improve the paper. We also gratefully mention Jim Beard for editorial handling and comments on the paper. This work was funded by NSF grant EAR 1250219 to K.P. and S.R.P. Geochronology work was made possible by an NSF EarthScope Geochronology Graduate Student Award to B.C.R. C.B.K. was supported in part by a US Department of Energy Computational Science Graduate Fellowship under contract DE-FG02-97ER25308. Computational resources were provided by the Princeton Institute for Computational Science and Engineering.

Attached Files

Supplemental Material - egy079_suppl_figures.pdf

Supplemental Material - egy079_supplementary_file_1.xlsx

Supplemental Material - egy079_supplementary_file_2.xlsx

Supplemental Material - egy079_supplementary_file_3.xls

Supplemental Material - egy079_supplementary_file_4.xlsx

Supplemental Material - egy079_supplementary_file_5.xlsx

Supplemental Material - egy079_supplementary_file_6.xlsx

Supplemental Material - egy079_supplementary_file_7.xls

Files

egy079_suppl_figures.pdf
Files (243.6 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:908f59000d44688749dd4335a819ceea
243.0 MB Preview Download
md5:80c8a62af5186f389013e0a24d491ca7
193.1 kB Download
md5:dcdb8f4e6409d9c02559fa5e07c0432d
73.3 kB Download
md5:fe33ff106220a68f2d8f0075f8c6bc94
10.3 kB Download
md5:f0bc8b2f6dc3e52ef192dcdae645e4cd
51.9 kB Download
md5:c521c6b5ebf1cfb1ec690a0ba38d4396
101.4 kB Download
md5:638566540f156e4d4037a9aab4fbb40d
46.1 kB Download
md5:de935d344f7ca682be157e457442af11
60.9 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 21, 2023
Modified:
October 19, 2023