Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published August 2018 | Published
Journal Article Open

The Seasonality of Physically Driven Export at Submesoscales in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean

Abstract

Submesoscale dynamics O(1–100 km) are associated with enhanced vertical velocities and evolve on a time scale similar to that of biological production (hours to days). Here we consider an annual cycle of submesoscale dynamics and their relation to productivity and export in a small (20 × 20 km) region of the northeast Atlantic Ocean. In this region, a springtime bloom is initiated by restratification of the mixed layer in June, although intermittent shoaling of the mixed layer maintains phytoplankton populations throughout the year. An optical community index suggests a dominance of large species (e.g., diatoms) during spring and picophytoplankton during the winter. We review three types of submesoscale instabilities—mixed layer (baroclinic), gravitational, and symmetric—and consider the impact of each on export of fixed carbon out of the surface layer. Mixed layer instabilities can potentially export material out of the mixed layer during winter, although the vertical velocity across the base of the mixed layer is sensitive to the parameterization scheme. Symmetric instabilities, in contrast, provide a clear mechanism for rapid export out of the mixed layer. A crucial factor determining export potential is the strength of the pycnocline at the base of the mixed layer. Export production is sensitive to the degree of overlap that exists between intense submesoscale activity associated with deep mixed layers in the winter and high productivity associated with the spring restratification, meaning that physically driven export of fixed carbon will likely happen over a short time window during spring.

Additional Information

© 2018 American Geophysical Union. Received 13 MAR 2018; Accepted 14 JUN 2018; Accepted article online 22 JUN 2018; Published online 9 AUG 2018; Correction 30 AUG 2018. We are grateful for the efforts of the entire OSMOSIS team and the crews of the RRS Discovery, the R/V Celtic Explorer, and the RRS James Cook. The authors thank Gillian Damerell, Stephanie Henson, Adrian Martin, Stuart Painter, and Nathan Briggs for helpful conversations related to this manuscript, as well as two anonymous reviewers for their comments. Glider data are held at the British Oceanographic Data Centre and are accessible at https://doi.org/10/cqc6. Code to generate the figures can be found at https://github.com/zerickso/GBC18. Satellite data were provided by NASA Goddard Space Flight Center at http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov. Meteorological data were supplied by ECMWF at http://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/. Sea surface height was through AVISO data products at https://www.aviso.altimetry.fr/en/data.html. Color maps for Figures 1a, 5, 7, 8, and 10 are from the cmocean package by Kristen Thyng (https://matplotlib.org/cmocean/), and for Figure 12 the colormap is from the colorcet package by Peter Kovesi (https://github.com/bokeh/colorcet). The OSMOSIS project was funded by NERC grant NE/I019905/1 and NSFOCE‐1155676, and the authors acknowledge funding from the David and Lucille Packard Foundation.

Errata

In the originally published version of this paper, Figure 5, panel (a) was incorrect. The figure has since been corrected, and this version may be considered the authoritative version of record.

Attached Files

Published - Erickson_et_al-2018-Global_Biogeochemical_Cycles.pdf

Files

Erickson_et_al-2018-Global_Biogeochemical_Cycles.pdf
Files (5.2 MB)

Additional details

Created:
August 24, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023