Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published October 30, 2017 | Submitted
Report Open

The "New Political History": A Methodological Critique

Abstract

In a recent review article, one of the leading figures of the "new political history," Samuel P. Hays, argued that "a preoccupation with technique" on the part of both critics and defenders of the genre has obscured the more important advances it had brought to the discipline the reformulation of historical concepts and the substitution of "systematic" for "intuitive" tests of hypotheses. "The social research movement," he concluded, "critically needs to take stock of itself, seriously debate where it is going, and move from its initial enthusiasm with techniques to a concern for methods and theory."

Additional Information

I wish to thank Allan. G. Bogue of the University of Wisconsin and my Caltech colleagues, John Ferejohn, Mo Fiorina, David. Grether, Dan Kevles, and Forrest Nelson for their most helpful comments, some of which I rejected, no doubt at my peril. They are not, therefore, responsible for any remaining blunders or infelicities. Published as Kousser, J. Morgan (1976) The "New Political History": A Methodological Critique. Reviews in American History, 4. pp. 1-14.

Attached Files

Submitted - sswp105.pdf

Files

sswp105.pdf
Files (568.2 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:46ce989c4c60c6a6eb11a1a9088124dd
568.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
March 5, 2024