Legislative Districting
- Creators
- Lowenstein, Daniel Hayes
Abstract
America never knew the rotten boroughs that John Locke called "gross absurdities" and condemned as being incompatible with the right of equal representation (Locke, 1812, at 433). Rotten boroughs were towns "of which there remain[ed] not so much as the ruins, where scarce so much housing as a sheepcote, or more inhabitants than a shepherd [were] to be found, [but that sent] as many representatives to the grand assembly of law-makers, as a whole county numerous in people, and powerful in riches" (id., at 432). The United States did inherit from Britain the so-called Westminster system, in which legislators are elected, usually one apiece, from geographically defined districts, with the candidate receiving the most votes declared the winner. Perhaps the system was inevitable in a time with neither full-fledged political parties nor modem devices of transportation and communication. In any event, the system has been permanently embedded in American political thought and practice.
Attached Files
Published - sswp701.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:b9aca10611aaafee968e5df08ea49c29
|
478.1 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 81141
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20170905-131623600
- Created
-
2017-09-05Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2019-10-03Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Social Science Working Papers
- Series Name
- Social Science Working Paper
- Series Volume or Issue Number
- 701