Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published June 2017 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

From Stiffness to Strength: Formulation and Validation of a Hybrid Hyperbolic Nonlinear Soil Model for Site‐Response Analyses

Abstract

Nonlinear site‐response analyses are becoming an increasingly important component of simulated ground motions for engineering applications. For regional‐scale problems for which geotechnical data are sparse, the challenge lies in computing site response using a very small number of input parameters. We developed a nonlinear soil model that, using only the shear‐wave velocity profile, captures both the low‐strain stiffness and large‐strain strength of soils and yields reliable predictions of soil response to weak and strong shaking. We here present the formulation of the model and an extensive validation study based on downhole array recordings, with peak ground acceleration (PGA) ranging from 0.01g to 0.9g. We also show that our model, referred to as hybrid hyperbolic (HH), outperforms existing nonlinear formulations and simplified site‐response analyses widely used in practice for ground motions that induce more than 0.04% of soil strain (roughly equivalent to PGA higher than 0.05g). In addition to site‐specific response predictions at sites with limited site characterization, the HH model can help improve site amplification factors of ground‐motion prediction equations (GMPEs) by complementing the empirical data with simulated site‐response analyses for very strong ground shaking, as well as physics‐based ground‐motion simulations, particularly for deeper sedimentary sites with low resonant frequencies.

Additional Information

© 2017 Seismological Society of America. Manuscript received 21 October 2015; Published Online 4 April 2017. This research was supported by the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC; Contribution Number 6019). SCEC is funded by National Science Foundation (NSF) Cooperative Agreement EAR-1033462 and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Cooperative Agreement G12AC20038. We are grateful for the financial support that has made this research possible. We would also like to acknowledge the help of Paul J. Vardanega and Malcolm D. Bolton, who provided us with direct shear test data from the literature and from their experimental work; and Rui Wang, who helped us conceptually refine our soil constitutive model. We finally wish to thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which led to significant improvements over our initial submission.

Attached Files

Published - 1336.full.pdf

Supplemental Material - 2015287_esupp_Figure_S1.png

Supplemental Material - 2015287_esupp_Figure_S2.png

Supplemental Material - 2015287_esupp_Figure_S3.png

Supplemental Material - 2015287_esupp_Figure_S4.png

Supplemental Material - 2015287_esupp_Figure_S5.png

Supplemental Material - 2015287_esupp_Figure_S6.png

Supplemental Material - 2015287_esupp_Figure_S7.png

Supplemental Material - 2015287_esupp_Figure_S8.png

Supplemental Material - 2015287_esupp_Figure_S9.png

Files

2015287_esupp_Figure_S5.png
Files (7.6 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:ff8012fdc028397208165b14083aef7d
317.3 kB Preview Download
md5:5c8989c09f443b7a16bda221795e67a5
306.0 kB Preview Download
md5:6662212cd2430703b5f09261f2fc42db
262.8 kB Preview Download
md5:573eaa2d61e0c340c6f0e44a175d096b
269.0 kB Preview Download
md5:f4d43b90095fa2ad476543889dffe343
281.7 kB Preview Download
md5:6a937778cb7e2f4cc7b39839bee0e67e
317.5 kB Preview Download
md5:8627a3d3c277ec78a267b64b7b2f5e31
377.1 kB Preview Download
md5:a642383c02a45c61e9e5b933fa08920e
271.8 kB Preview Download
md5:6483bd86c3b131742e3eda26af89a99f
4.9 MB Preview Download
md5:b151712c129cf428f01add45662faab5
286.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 25, 2023