Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published January 3, 2017 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Mechanism of membrane fusion induced by vesicular stomatitis virus G protein

Abstract

The glycoproteins (G proteins) of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and related rhabdoviruses (e.g., rabies virus) mediate both cell attachment and membrane fusion. The reversibility of their fusogenic conformational transitions differentiates them from many other low-pH-induced viral fusion proteins. We report single-virion fusion experiments, using methods developed in previous publications to probe fusion of influenza and West Nile viruses. We show that a three-stage model fits VSV single-particle fusion kinetics: (i) reversible, pH-dependent, G-protein conformational change from the known prefusion conformation to an extended, monomeric intermediate; (ii) reversible trimerization and clustering of the G-protein fusion loops, leading to an extended intermediate that inserts the fusion loops into the target-cell membrane; and (iii) folding back of a cluster of extended trimers into their postfusion conformations, bringing together the viral and cellular membranes. From simulations of the kinetic data, we conclude that the critical number of G-protein trimers required to overcome membrane resistance is 3 to 5, within a contact zone between the virus and the target membrane of 30 to 50 trimers. This sequence of conformational events is similar to those shown to describe fusion by influenza virus hemagglutinin (a "class I" fusogen) and West Nile virus envelope protein ("class II"). Our study of VSV now extends this description to "class III" viral fusion proteins, showing that reversibility of the low-pH-induced transition and architectural differences in the fusion proteins themselves do not change the basic mechanism by which they catalyze membrane fusion.

Additional Information

© 2017 National Academy of Sciences. Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. Contributed by Stephen C. Harrison, November 17, 2016 (sent for review October 10, 2016; reviewed by Axel T. Brunger and Frederick M. Hughson). Published online before print December 14, 2016, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618883114 We thank Anna Loveland and Joe Loparo for help with TIRF microscopy and discussions; Amy Lee and David Cureton for help with virus growth and purification; Erick Matsen and Kyung-Suk Kim for initial discussions on the model; Maria Ericsson and the Harvard Medical School Cell Biology Electron Microscopy Facility; and Raffaele Potami for help with setting up parallel computing. I.S.K. acknowledges a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. The research was supported by NIH Grant CA-13202 to S.C.H., who is an Investigator in the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Author contributions: I.S.K., S.P.J.W., A.M.v.O., and S.C.H. designed research; I.S.K. acquired data; I.S.K., A.M.v.O., and S.C.H. analyzed data; I.S.K. and S.J. designed and implemented the kinetic model; M.L.S. and S.P.J.W. contributed new reagents; E.R. contributed new analytic tools; and I.S.K., S.J., and S.C.H. wrote the paper. Reviewers: A.T.B., Stanford University; and F.M.H., Princeton University. The authors declare no conflict of interest. This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1618883114/-/DCSupplemental.

Attached Files

Published - PNAS-2017-Kim-E28-36.pdf

Supplemental Material - pnas.1618883114.sm01.mp4

Supplemental Material - pnas.1618883114.sm02.mp4

Files

PNAS-2017-Kim-E28-36.pdf
Files (22.1 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:d631dd39b94f83f53eeea1b95bea2ea0
1.2 MB Preview Download
md5:ac6418159f265c97f064b806f5db1f51
9.1 MB Download
md5:fcaf6b13a0de377aaa3a4d825fb1f398
11.8 MB Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 24, 2023