Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published November 2016 | Published
Journal Article Open

Mirror mode waves in Venus's magnetosheath: solar minimum vs. solar maximum

Abstract

The observational rate of mirror mode waves in Venus's magnetosheath for solar maximum conditions is studied and compared with previous results for solar minimum conditions. It is found that the number of mirror mode events is approximately 14 % higher for solar maximum than for solar minimum. A possible cause is the increase in solar UV radiation, ionizing more neutrals from Venus's exosphere and the outward displacement of the bow shock during solar maximum. Also, the solar wind properties (speed, density) differ for solar minimum and maximum. The maximum observational rate, however, over Venus's magnetosheath remains almost the same, with only differences in the distribution along the flow line. This may be caused by the interplay of a decreasing solar wind density and a slightly higher solar wind velocity for this solar maximum. The distribution of strengths of the mirror mode waves is shown to be exponentially falling off, with (almost) the same coefficient for solar maximum and minimum. The plasma conditions in Venus's magnetosheath are different for solar minimum as compared to solar maximum. For solar minimum, mirror mode waves are created directly behind where the bow shock will decay, whereas for solar maximum all created mirror modes can grow.

Additional Information

© 2016 Author(s). This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Received: 30 May 2016 – Revised: 29 September 2016 – Accepted: 8 November 2016 – Published: 23 November 2016. The work by Daniel Schmid was supported by the Austrian Science Fund FWF under grant P25257-N27. Portions of this work were performed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under contract with NASA. The topical editor, Y. Miyoshi, thanks G. Erdös and one anonymous referee for help in evaluating this paper.

Attached Files

Published - angeo-34-1099-2016.pdf

Files

angeo-34-1099-2016.pdf
Files (718.6 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:1464f86f4227612ecd0b35089170dd73
718.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
October 24, 2023