Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published January 6, 2017 | Supplemental Material + Accepted Version
Journal Article Open

1,2-H- versus 1,2-C-Shift on Sn-Silsesquioxanes

Abstract

Lewis acidic zeolites such as Sn-Beta catalyze glucose isomerization to fructose via an intramolecular 1,2-H-shift reaction, a key step for converting lignocellulosic biomass into renewable chemicals. Na-exchange of Sn-Beta titrates the neighboring SiOH group in the open Sn site and shifts catalyst selectivity to mannose formed by a 1,2-C-shift reaction. To probe structure/activity relationships in the zeolite, tin-containing silsesquioxanes with (1a) and without (1b) a neighboring SiOH group were recently synthesized and tested. These molecular catalysts are active for glucose conversion, and the presence (absence) of the SiOH favors fructose (mannose) selectivity by intramolecular H(C)-shift reactions. Using density functional theory, we investigated numerous H/C-shift pathways on these tin-silsesquioxane catalysts. On both 1a and 1b, the H-shift reaction occurs through a bidentate binding mode without participation of the SiOH, while the bidentate binding mode is not favored for the C-shift due to steric hindrance. Instead, the C-shift reaction occurs through different concerted reaction pathways, in which an acetylacetonate (acac) ligand interacts with the substrate in the transition state complexes. Favorable H-shift pathways without SiOH participation and acac ligand promotion of the C-shift pathway explain why 1a produces mannose from C-shift reactions instead of exclusively catalyzing H-shift reactions, as the Sn-Beta open site does.

Additional Information

© 2016 American Chemical Society. Received: November 2, 2016; Published: November 15, 2016. Research was supported as part of the Catalysis Center for Energy Innovation, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES), under Award No. DE-SC0001004. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. T.R.J. wishes to acknowledge funding from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. 0750966, as well as the George W. Laird Merit Fellowship. S.K.B. wishes to acknowledge funding from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE-1144469. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors thank Professor Mark Davis and Dr. Jeff Christianson for numerous useful conversations. The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Attached Files

Accepted Version - acscatal_2E6b03128.pdf

Supplemental Material - cs6b03128_si_001.pdf

Supplemental Material - cs6b03128_si_002.zip

Supplemental Material - cs6b03128_si_003.zip

Files

cs6b03128_si_001.pdf
Files (3.4 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:97be279dc7ce28bbd4ad942fd13a885a
794.6 kB Preview Download
md5:b0352b67f212a16b2db6b745552b8fe8
111.5 kB Preview Download
md5:8a39503ffbae411cb353f48ef8f0157d
2.3 MB Preview Download
md5:eaa4aa6d48c935c795f92116fad8db4a
209.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023