Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published September 30, 2016 | Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

The interplay between chromosome stability and cell cycle control explored through gene–gene interaction and computational simulation

Abstract

Chromosome stability models are usually qualitative models derived from molecular-genetic mechanisms for DNA repair, DNA synthesis, and cell division. While qualitative models are informative, they are also challenging to reformulate as precise quantitative models. In this report we explore how (A) laboratory experiments, (B) quantitative simulation, and (C) seriation algorithms can inform models of chromosome stability. Laboratory experiments were used to identify 19 genes that when over-expressed cause chromosome instability in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To better understand the molecular mechanisms by which these genes act, we explored their genetic interactions with 18 deletion mutations known to cause chromosome instability. Quantitative simulations based on a mathematical model of the cell cycle were used to predict the consequences of several genetic interactions. These simulations lead us to suspect that the chromosome instability genes cause cell-cycle perturbations. Cellcycle involvement was confirmed using a seriation algorithm, which was used to analyze the genetic interaction matrix to reveal an underlying cyclical pattern. The seriation algorithm searched over 1014 possible arrangements of rows and columns to find one optimal arrangement, which correctly reflects events during cell cycle phases. To conclude, we illustrate how the molecular mechanisms behind these cell cycle events are consistent with established molecular interaction maps.

Additional Information

© The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Received April 03, 2016; revised July 01, 2016; accepted August 05, 2016; first published online August 16, 2016. We thank Eric Phizicky and Elizabeth Grayhack for supplying the MORF library; Phil Hieter for supplying strain YPH275; Raghavan Vasudevan, Vikashni Padmakumar, and Kankshit Bheda for transformations and plasmid purification; Arvind Kothandaraman, Rishov Chatterjee, and Hardeep Chiraya for laboratory logistics; Jose Salazar and Tanya Ferguson for Biomek FXP liquid handler support; Bryan Kraynack and Kirilynn Svay for training; Herbert Sauro, Alpan Raval, Craig Adams, Ali Nadim, and Susan Kane for discussions; David Galas for support and encouragement. We thank Dr. Babetta L. Marrone (Director, National Flow Cytometry Resource) for helpful discussions on image analysis. National Science Foundation [0527023, 0523643, 0523643, 0941078 to A.R.]; National Institutes of Health [1R01GM084881-01 to A.R.]. Part of the work was supported by the Los Alamos National Laboratory National Flow Cytometry Resource funded by the National Center for Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health [P41-RR01315]. Funding for open access charge: Keck Graduate Institute. Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

Attached Files

Published - gkw715.pdf

Supplemental Material - nar-00958-n-2016-File014.pdf

Files

gkw715.pdf
Files (3.0 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:9a8be36ef912d345e6c78b123f983580
1.3 MB Preview Download
md5:e2e70c3870a4ed6664017de248d85280
1.7 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023