Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published September 17, 2014 | Published
Journal Article Open

Spatial and Temporal Eye-Hand Coordination Relies on the Parietal Reach Region

Abstract

Coordinated eye movements are crucial for precision control of our hands. A commonly believed neural mechanism underlying eye–hand coordination is interaction between the neural networks controlling each effector, exchanging, and matching information, such as movement target location and onset time. Alternatively, eye–hand coordination may result simply from common inputs to independent eye and hand control pathways. Thus far, it remains unknown whether and where either of these two possible mechanisms exists. A candidate location for the former mechanism, interpathway communication, includes the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) where distinct effector-specific areas reside. If the PPC were within the network for eye–hand coordination, perturbing it would affect both eye and hand movements that are concurrently planned. In contrast, if eye–hand coordination arises solely from common inputs, perturbing one effector pathway, e.g., the parietal reach region (PRR), would not affect the other effector. To test these hypotheses, we inactivated part of PRR in the macaque, located in the medial bank of the intraparietal sulcus encompassing the medial intraparietal area and area 5V. When each effector moved alone, PRR inactivation shortened reach but not saccade amplitudes, compatible with the known reach-selective activity of PRR. However, when both effectors moved concurrently, PRR inactivation shortened both reach and saccade amplitudes, and decoupled their reaction times. Therefore, consistent with the interpathway communication hypothesis, we propose that the planning of concurrent eye and hand movements causes the spatial information in PRR to influence the otherwise independent eye control pathways, and that their temporal coupling requires an intact PRR.

Additional Information

© 2014 the authors. Received Aug. 30, 2013; revised Aug. 8, 2014; accepted Aug. 13, 2014. This work was supported by NIH Grants EY007492, EY013337, EY005522, and DARPA award N66001-10-C-2009; E.J.H. was supported by NIH Career Development Award K99 NS062894; and M.W. was supported by the Herman-and Lilly Schilling Foundation and the German Research Foundation (DFG) WI 406/1-1.Wethank Drs Igor Kagan and James Bonaiuto for the acquisition and processing of MR images, and Dr Bardia Behabadi for scientific discussion. Author contributions: E.J.H., M.H., and R.A.A. designed research; E.J.H., M.H., and M.W. performed research; E.J.H. analyzed data; E.J.H., M.W., and R.A.A. wrote the paper. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Attached Files

Published - 12884.full.pdf

Files

12884.full.pdf
Files (1.5 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:b3c93caa750589d2f1b711727f33f815
1.5 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 17, 2023