Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published August 25, 2003 | public
Journal Article

The Strong-Field Tripodal Phosphine Donor, [PhB(CH_2P^iPr_2)_3]^-, Provides Access to Electronically and Coordinatively Unsaturated Transition Metal Complexes

Abstract

This paper introduces a sterically encumbered, strong-field tris(diisopropylphosphino)borate ligand, [PhBPiPr3] ([PhBP^(iPr)_(3)] = [PhB(CH_2P^iPr_2)_3]^-, to probe aspects of its conformational and electronic characteristics within a host of complexes. To this end, the Tl(I) complex, [PhBP^iPr_3]Tl (1), was synthesized and characterized in the solid-state by X-ray diffraction analysis. This precursor proves to be an effective transmetallating agent, as evidenced by its reaction with the divalent halides FeCl_2 and CoX_2 (X = Cl, I) to produce the monomeric, 4-coordinate, high-spin derivatives [PhBP^iPr_3]FeCl_2 and [PhBP^iPr_3]CoX (X = Cl_3, I_4) in good yield. Complexes 2−4 were each characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis and shown to be monomeric in the solid-state. For conformational and electronic comparison within a system exhibiting higher than 4-coordination, the 16-electron ruthenium complexes {[PhBP^iPr_3]Ru(μ-Cl)}_2 (5) and {[PhBP_3]Ru(μ-Cl)}_2 (6) were prepared and characterized ([PhBP_3] = [PhB(CH_2PPh_2)_3]^-. The chloride complexes 2 and 3 reacted with excess CO to afford the divalent, monocarbonyl adducts [PhBP^iPr_3]FeCl(CO) (7) and [PhBP^iPr_3]CoCl(CO) (8), respectively. Reaction of 4 with excess CO resulted in the monovalent, dicarbonyl product [PhBP^iPr_3]CoI(CO)_2 (9). Complexes 5 and 6 also bound CO readily, providing the octahedral, 18-electron complexes [PhBP^iPr_3]RuCl(CO)_2 (10) and [PhBP_3]RuCl(CO)_2 (11), respectively. Dimers 5 and 6 were broken up by reaction with trimethylphosphine to produce the mono-PMe_3 adducts [PhBP^iPr_3]RuCl(PMe_3) (12) and [PhBP3]RuCl(PMe3) (13). Stoichiometric oxidation of 3 with dioxygen provided the 4-electron oxidation product [PhB(CH_2P(O)^iPr_2)_2(CH_2P^iPr_2)]CoCl (14), while exposure of 3 to excess oxygen results in the 6-electron oxidation product [PhB(CH_2P(O)^iPr_2)_3]CoCl (15). Complexes 2 and 4 were characterized via cyclic voltammetry to compare their redox behavior to their [PhBP_3] analogues. Complex 4 was also studied by SQUID magnetization and EPR spectroscopy to confirm its high-spin assignment, providing an interesting contrast to its previously described low-spin relative, [PhBP_3]CoI. The difference in spin states observed for these two systems reflects the conformational rigidity of the [PhBPiPr3] ligand by comparison to [PhBP_3], leaving the former less able to accommodate a JT-distorted electronic ground state.

Additional Information

© 2014 American Chemical Society. Received March 21, 2003. We acknowledge the Dreyfus Foundation and the ACS Petroleum Research Fund for financial support. T.A.B. thanks the Department of Defense for a graduate research fellowship. J.C.P. is grateful for a Camille-Dreyfus Teacher Scholar Award.

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 26, 2023