Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published April 2007 | Submitted
Journal Article Open

Where, oh where has the r-process gone?

Abstract

We present a review of the possible sources for r-process nuclei (r-nuclei). It is known that there is as yet no self-consistent mechanism to provide abundant neutrons for a robust r-process in the neutrino-driven winds from nascent neutron stars. We consider that the heavy r-nuclei with mass numbers A>130 (Ba and above) cannot be produced in the neutrino-driven winds. Nonetheless, the r-process and the neutrino-driven winds may be directly or indirectly related by some unknown additional mechanism, which, for example, could provide ejecta with very short dynamic timescales of ≾0.004 s. This undetermined mechanism must supply a neutron source within the same general stellar sites that undergo core collapse to produce the neutron star. Observational data on low-metallicity stars in the Galactic halo show that sites producing the heavy r-nuclei do not produce Fe or any other elements between N and Ge. Insofar as a forming neutron star is key to producing the heavy r-nuclei, then the only possible sources are supernovae resulting from collapse of O–Ne–Mg cores or accretion-induced collapse of white dwarfs, neither of which produce the elements of the Fe group or those of intermediate mass (above C and N). Observational evidence on s and r-nuclei in low-metallicity stars with high C and N abundances shows that the r-process is also active in binary systems. The nuclei with A∼90–110 produced by charged-particle reactions (CPR) in the neutrino-driven winds are in general present in metal-poor stars with high or low abundances of heavy r-nuclei. The CPR nuclei and the heavy r-nuclei are not strongly coupled. Some metal-poor stars show extremely high enrichments of heavy r-nuclei and have established that the abundance patterns of these nuclei are universally close to the solar abundance pattern of heavy r-nuclei. Using a template star with high enrichments of heavy r-nuclei and another with low enrichments we develop a two-component model based on the abundances of Eu (from sources for heavy r-nuclei) and Fe (from Fe core-collapse supernovae). This model gives very good quantitative predictions for the abundances of all the other elements in those metal-poor stars with [Fe/H]≲-1.5 for which the Eu and Fe abundances are known. We attribute the CPR elements such as Sr, Y, and Zr to reactions in the neutrino-driven winds from a nascent neutron star and the heavy r-nuclei to the hypothecated true "r-process". The CPR nuclei should be produced whenever a neutron star is formed regardless of whether heavy r-nuclei are produced or not. Using the two-component model we estimate the yield of the CPR element Sr to be ∼10^(-6)M_⊙ for a single neutron star formation event. Self-consistent astrophysical models are needed to establish that the CPR nuclei are common to the neutron stars produced in both sources for the heavy r-nuclei and those for Fe. We show that the observational data appear fully consistent with the two-component model. The specific mechanism and site for the production of heavy r-nuclei remains to be found.

Additional Information

© 2007 Elsevier B.V. Available online 16 February 2007. editor: G.E. Brown. The authors thank Hans for many stimulating and illuminating conversations and for being supportive of a strange new approach to the science at hand.We thank Alex Heger and Ken Nomoto for educating us on presupernova evolution and for providing us with Figs. 9 and 10, respectively, John Lattanzio for pointing us to literature on AGB stars, and Judy Cohen and Wako Aoki for permitting us to use Figs. 12 and 13, respectively, from their published works. We also thank Marc Kamionkowski for his patience with our unsuccessful efforts in writing a more extensive article with cosmic views on the subject and ask for his forgiveness. Hopefully, this contribution covers much of what we were to write. This work was supported in part by the US Department of Energy under grants DE-FG02-87ER40328 (Y.-Z.Q.) and DE-FG03-88ER13851 (G.J.W.), Caltech Division Contribution 9176(1122).

Attached Files

Submitted - 0708.1767v1.pdf

Files

0708.1767v1.pdf
Files (970.6 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:1ab75aba784e3d5ec29df13b91984328
970.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 25, 2023