Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published April 1985 | public
Journal Article

Self-shielding in O_2—a possible explanation for oxygen isotopic anomalies in meteorites?

Abstract

It is known that self-shielding of UV radiation by ^(16)O_2 produces selective isotopic effects upon photodissociation. An analysis of this process and the chemical kinetics of isotopic exchange and trapping of O has been carried out for different gas compositions and temperatures. Calculations of the shift in ^(16)O,^(17)O,^(18)O abundances due to self-shielding were carried out, and it is shown that the specific rates of photodissociation J_i give J_(17)/J_(18) ∼ 1 for column densities of O_2 between ∼ 10^(19) and 10^(22) molecules/cm^2 with a maximum value of J_(17)/J_(16) = 11 at a column density of ∼ 10^(21) molecules/cm^2. The O produced in this manner would have ^(17)O/^(18)O close to the starting material but be depleted in ^(16)O. These large shifts are quenched at temperatures higher than 500 K, or if water is present in higher concentration than O_2. Following dissociation, fast isotopic exchange reactions (e.g. ^(17)O + ^(16)O_2 → ^(16)O + ^(17)O ^(16)O) may destroy the effect unless the atomic oxygen is efficiently trapped. Competition between trapping and exchange is shown to be of a simple mathematical form which depends on the ratio of the rate of trapping of O to the rate of exchange. Using known rate constants it is shown that trapping of anomalous O by metal atoms, hydrogen, or the O_2 itself is inefficient at pressures lower than 10^(−3) atm and normal solar abundances. Trapping on dust grains may be efficient if all oxides are present as sub-micron particles. However, the extinction of radiation by the dust is likely to quench the self-shielding effect itself. Self-shielding of radiation by O_2, may, under special conditions, lead to the production of isotopically anomalous products. However, in the light of the difficulties throughout many stages of the process, it appears to be an unsatisfactory explanation for the oxygen anomalies observed in meteorites. The above considerations are also applied to two experiments where O is trapped by O_2 to form ozone. The isotopic shifts found in experiments by Sander et al. [10] in O_3 are compatible with the criteria developed here. The shifts found by Thiemens and Heidenreich [11,12] using a discharge cannot be explained by self-shielding of UV radiation as the pressure is below the minimum needed for self-shielding to occur. The general nature of the pressure dependence of recent discharge experiments by Thiemens and others is in agreement with the prediction of a simple kinetic model based on the production of isotopically anomalous O during dissociation of O_2, isotopic exchange of O and O_2, and ozone formation. The observed isotopic effects in O_3 produced and trapped during discharge in O_2 thus appear to be understood phenomenologically but the mechanism for selective isotopic dissociation of O_2 is still obscure and remains a fundamental problem. Our analysis is directed toward O_2-rich environments and may only have limited applicability in the environment of the solar nebula. However, the general approach presented here is useful and may be applied to CO. It appears that selective isotopic shielding, or the mechanism which operates in the discharge experiments may still provide an explanation for some isotopic effects observed in meteorites but only if rapid trapping and isolation mechanisms (relative to exchange) can be found which apply in a low-pressure regime.

Additional Information

© 1985 Elsevier Science. Received September 24, 1984. Revised version received November 26, 1984. We would like to thank Yuk Yung both for his scholarly criticisms and stimulating suggestion regarding charged particle reactions. Mark Allen has provided cogent criticism and useful advice. Many thanks to Steven Koonin, Onno Van Roosmalen, William Langer and Eric Herbst for discussing molecular physics with us and to Dave Stevenson, Mark Thiemens and an anonymous reviewer for their suggestions. Mark Thiemens has been generous in sharing his data and ideas from the exciting discharge experiments. A short summary of this work was presented at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference XV [17]. This work was supported by NSF PHY-8215500 and NASA NAG 9-43.

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 25, 2023