Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published March 2013 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Report on the August 2012 Brawley Earthquake Swarm in Imperial Valley, Southern California

Abstract

The 2012 Brawley earthquake swarm occurred in the Brawley Seismic Zone (BSZ) within the Imperial Valley of southern California (Fig. 1). The BSZ is the northernmost extensional segment of the Pacific–North America plate boundary system. Johnson and Hill (1982) used the distribution of seismicity since the 1930s to outline the geographical extent of the BSZ, defining boundaries of the BSZ as shown in Figure 1. Its north–south extent ranges from the northern section of the Imperial fault, starting approximately 10 km north of the United States–Mexico international border and connecting to the southern end of the San Andreas fault, where it terminates in the Salton Sea. Larsen and Reilinger (1991), who defined a similar geographical extent of the BSZ, argued that the BSZ was migrating to the northwest, which they associated with the propagation of the Gulf of California rift system into the North American continent. During the seismically active period of the 1970s, the BSZ produced close to half of the earthquakes recorded in California (Johnson and Hill, 1982; Hutton et al., 2010). However, for two decades following the 1979 Imperial Valley mainshock M_w 6.4 and its aftershock sequence, the BSZ was much less active. In general, the BSZ seismicity is indicative of right-lateral strike-slip plate motion accompanied by crustal thinning as well as possible associated fluid movements in the crust (Chen and Shearer, 2011). The 2012 Brawley swarm produced more than 600 events recorded by the United States Geological Survey (USGS)–California Institute of Technology (Caltech) Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN). Other monitoring instruments in the region, such as the Global Positioning System (GPS) network, creepmeters, and the Wildlife Liquefaction Array (WLA) also recorded signals from the largest events. In addition, Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) satellites collected images from space.

Additional Information

© 2013 Seismological Society of America. We thank the personnel of the United States Geological Survey (USGS)–California Institute of Technology (Caltech) Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN) for picking the arrival times and archiving the seismograms and the Southern California Earthquake Data Center for distributing the data. TerraSAR-X data are copyright 2012 DLR and were provided under the Group on Earth Observation (GEO) Geohazard Supersite program project prlund_GEO0927. E. Hauksson and W. Yang were supported by the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program/USGS Grant 12HQPA0001. This research was also supported by the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), which is funded by National Science Foundation (NSF) Cooperative Agreement EAR-0529922 and USGS Cooperative Agreement 07HQAG0008. This paper is Contribution 1678 of SCEC and Contribution 10083 of the Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, Caltech, Pasadena, California. We thank K. Marty (Imperial Valley College) and S. Williams (consulting geologist from Imperial, California) for help with fieldwork. The high-rate GPS data were processed and provided by S. Owen from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). Part of this research was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Earth Surface and Interior focus area and performed at the JPL, Caltech. We thank G. Fuis and D. Hill for reviews and J. Hole for valuable discussions about the tectonics and velocity structure. J. Stock's participation was supported by NSF Grant OCE-0742253. The University of California at Santa Barbara operates the Wildlife Liquefaction Array facility, with funding through the George E. Brown, Jr., Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation program of the NSF under Award CMMI-0927178. Most figures were done using GMT (Wessel and Smith, 1998).

Attached Files

Published - 177.full.pdf

Supplemental Material - Brawley_2012_slipmodel_table.txt

Supplemental Material - Brawley_2012_stress_drops_table.txt

Files

177.full.pdf
Files (1.7 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:fbab523b0cb84bf9b4307b905d254696
1.7 MB Preview Download
md5:94bf4f9cc1bc687d3442186a068106f7
16.7 kB Preview Download
md5:8c88a28190d56d67896147a3a4e48ec7
27.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023