Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published June 2005 | Published
Journal Article Open

Southern California Hypocenter Relocation with Waveform Cross-Correlation, Part 1: Results Using the Double-Difference Method

Abstract

We present the results of relocating 327,000 southern California earthquakes that occurred between 1984 and 2002. We apply time-domain waveform cross-correlation for P and S waves between each event and 100 neighboring events identified from the catalog based on a 3D velocity model. To simplify the computation, we first divide southern California into five polygons, such that there are ∼100,000 events or less in each region. The polygon boundaries are chosen to lie in regions of sparse seismicity. We calculate and save differential times from the peaks in the cross-correlation functions and use a spline interpolation method to achieve a nominal timing precision of 0.001 sec. These differential times, together with existing P- and S-phase picks, are input to the double-difference program of Waldhauser and Ellsworth (2000, 2002) to calculate refined hypocenters. We divide the southern California region into grid cells and successively relocate hypocenters within each grid cell. The overall resulting pattern of seismicity is more focused than the previously determined pattern from 1D or 3D models. The new improved locations are more clustered, in many cases by a factor of two or three, and often show clear linear alignments. In particular, the depth distribution is improved and less affected by layer boundaries in velocity models or other similar artifacts.

Additional Information

© 2005 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. Manuscript received 23 August 2004. The Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN), Kate Hutton and her staff, produced the earthquake phase picks used in this study, and the data were made available at the Southern California Earthquake Data Center. We thank Andy Michael of U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, for making available his technique for relocating the catalog with the grid-cell method. We thank L. Jones, J. Hardebeck, and D. Schaff for reviewing the manuscript, and I. Wong for constructive editorial comments. The figures were done using GMT (Wessel and Smith, 1991). This work was supported by NEHRP/USGS Grant 04HQGR0052 and by SCEC, which is funded by NSF Cooperative Agreement EAR-0106924 and USGS Cooperative Agreement 02HQAG0008; SCEC contribution no. 820. Contribution no. 9105, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.

Attached Files

Published - 896.full.pdf

Files

896.full.pdf
Files (379.8 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:ac25ac396f35d2dfef6e450d19c1f0c7
379.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023