Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published December 2012 | public
Journal Article

Laboratory studies on surface sampling of Bacillus anthracis contamination: summary, gaps and recommendations

Abstract

This article summarizes previous laboratory studies to characterize the performance of methods for collecting, storing/transporting, processing and analysing samples from surfaces contaminated by Bacillus anthracis or related surrogates. The focus is on plate culture and count estimates of surface contamination for swab, wipe and vacuum samples of porous and nonporous surfaces. Summaries of the previous studies and their results were assessed to identify gaps in information needed as inputs to calculate key parameters critical to risk management in biothreat incidents. One key parameter is the number of samples needed to make characterization or clearance decisions with specified statistical confidence. Other key parameters include the ability to calculate, following contamination incidents, the (i) estimates of B. anthracis contamination, as well as the bias and uncertainties in the estimates and (ii) confidence in characterization and clearance decisions for contaminated or decontaminated buildings. Gaps in knowledge and understanding identified during the summary of the studies are discussed. Additional work is needed to quantify (i) the false-negative rates of surface-sampling methods with lower concentrations on various surfaces and (ii) the effects on performance characteristics of: aerosol vs liquid deposition of spores, using surrogates instead of B. anthracis, real-world vs laboratory conditions and storage and transportation conditions. Recommendations are given for future evaluations of data from existing studies and possible new studies.

Additional Information

© 2012 The Society for Applied Microbiology. Received 6 December 2011, revised 11 June 2012 and accepted 23 June 2012. Article first published online: 17 Sep. 2012. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) work summarized in this article was funded by the Biological Research and Development Branch of the Chemical and Biological Division in the Science and Technology Directorate of the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We also acknowledge the US Department of Energy's Young Women in Science program, which funded the work of student intern Rebecca Hu. PNNL is a multiprogram national laboratory operated for the US Department of Energy by Battelle under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. The authors acknowledge Jayne Morrow (NIST), Paula Krauter (SNL), and Brent Pulsipher (PNNL) for reviewing the technical report from which this article was adapted, as well as Landon Sego (PNNL) for reviewing the report and the article. Finally, we acknowledge Maura Zimmerscheid for excellent copy editing. We also thank the authors of several publications we cited who provided (i) copies of presentations or prepublication copies of articles, (ii) additional data or calculations, (iii) additional information not included in their publications and (iv) feedback on initial tabular summaries of their work. These include Jamie Almeida (NIST), Mark Buttner (University of Nevada), Kenneth Cole (US Army Dugway Proving Grounds), Wayne Einfeld (SNL), Cheryl Estill (CDC), Misty Hein (CDC), Robert Knowlton (SNL), Paula Krauter (SNL), Laura Rose (CDC), and Nancy Valentine (PNNL). Versions of Tables 2a–5b with larger font size and less white space are available in the downloadable Piepel et al. (2011).

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023