Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published November 2012 | Published
Journal Article Open

Sea level and vertical motion of continents from dynamic earth models since the Late Cretaceous

Abstract

Dynamic earth models are used to better understand the impact of mantle dynamics on the vertical motion of continents and regional and global sea level change since the Late Cretaceous. A hybrid approach combines inverse and forward models of mantle convection and accounts for the principal contributors to long-term sea level change: the evolving distribution of ocean floor age, dynamic topography in oceanic and continental regions, and the geoid. We infer the relative importance of dynamic versus other factors of sea level change, determine time-dependent patterns of dynamic subsidence and uplift of continents, and derive a sea level curve. We find that both dynamic factors and the evolving distribution of sea floor age are important in controlling sea level. We track the movement of continents over large-scale dynamic topography by consistently mapping between mantle and plate frames of reference, and we find that this movement results in dynamic subsidence and uplift of continents. The amplitude of dynamic topography in continental regions is larger than global sea level in several regions and periods, so that it has controlled regional sea level in North and South America and Australia since the Late Cretaceous, northern Africa and Arabia since the late Eocene, and Southeast Asia in the Oligocene–Miocene. Eastern and southern Africa have experienced dynamic uplift over the last 20 to 30 m.y., whereas Siberia and Australia have experienced Cenozoic tilting. The dominant factor controlling global sea level is a changing oceanic lithosphere production that has resulted in a large amplitude sea level fall since the Late Cretaceous, with dynamic topography offsetting this fall.

Additional Information

© 2012 American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Manuscript received August 12, 2011; provisional acceptance November 21, 2011; revised manuscript received February 1, 2012; final acceptance March 26, 2012. All calculations were conducted at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) Geosciences Supercomputer Facility, partially supported by National Science Foundation EAR-0521699. This work was supported through Statoil, the National Science Foundation (EAR-0810303), and the Caltech Tectonics Observatory (by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation). The original CitcomS software was obtained from the Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics. This is contribution number 169 of the Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences and contribution number 10063 of the Tectonics Observatory, Caltech. The AAPG Editor thanks the following reviewers for their work on this paper: Steven G. Henry and Peter Webb.

Attached Files

Published - 2012_SpasojevicGurnis_AAPG_Bull.pdf

Files

2012_SpasojevicGurnis_AAPG_Bull.pdf
Files (2.5 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:7a1729b5b3b9d2f6ae3f84111c8bff66
2.5 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023