Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published June 2011 | Published
Journal Article Open

Benford's Law and the Detection of Election Fraud

Abstract

The proliferation of elections in even those states that are arguably anything but democratic has given rise to a focused interest on developing methods for detecting fraud in the official statistics of a state's election returns. Among these efforts are those that employ Benford's Law, with the most common application being an attempt to proclaim some election or another fraud free or replete with fraud. This essay, however, argues that, despite its apparent utility in looking at other phenomena, Benford's Law is problematical at best as a forensic tool when applied to elections. Looking at simulations designed to model both fair and fraudulent contests as well as data drawn from elections we know, on the basis of other investigations, were either permeated by fraud or unlikely to have experienced any measurable malfeasance, we find that conformity with and deviations from Benford's Law follow no pattern. It is not simply that the Law occasionally judges a fraudulent election fair or a fair election fraudulent. Its "success rate" either way is essentially equivalent to a toss of a coin, thereby rendering it problematical at best as a forensic tool and wholly misleading at worst.

Additional Information

© The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology. Funding: The California Institute of Technology by the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research.

Attached Files

Published - Deckert_PoliticalAnalysis_2011.pdf

Files

Deckert_PoliticalAnalysis_2011.pdf
Files (386.1 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:176056a5f01c1ec79ca0d117479b7fd6
386.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 24, 2023