Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published February 1987 | Published
Report Open

Explanations reconsidered

Abstract

Edna Ullmann-Margalit .introduced the notion of an invisiblehand explanation (I-H explanation) to the philosophical literature in 1978, and made a distinction between "aggregate" and "functional-evolutionary" (F-E) forms of I -H explanations. The present paper produces a substantially refined analysis of the forms and functions of I-H explanations. Sections (1) and (2) introduce the ideas of I-H and aggregate I-H explanation, respectively. Section (J) argues that no one form of explanation can serve the explanatory fUnctions Ullmann-Margalit attributes to aggregate explanations, and divides those explanatory functions between genetic and "systematic-dispositional" explanations. Section (4) identifies difficulties with the idea of F-E explanation in the social realm, and shows that any I-H explanations fitting the P-E mold would constitute simply a special class of "aggregate" explanation.

Additional Information

I owe thanks to Edna Ullmann-Margalit, Merrilee Salmon. Sandra Mitchell, and especially Carl G. Hempel and Joseph Camp. for their encouragement and useful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Attached Files

Published - HumsWP-0120.pdf

Files

HumsWP-0120.pdf
Files (865.6 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:242533abd21f9bc303e57c2279578d13
865.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
January 13, 2024