Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published March 28, 2011 | Published
Journal Article Open

Single Gene Deletions of Orexin, Leptin, Neuropeptide Y, and Ghrelin Do Not Appreciably Alter Food Anticipatory Activity in Mice

Abstract

Timing activity to match resource availability is a widely conserved ability in nature. Scheduled feeding of a limited amount of food induces increased activity prior to feeding time in animals as diverse as fish and rodents. Typically, food anticipatory activity (FAA) involves temporally restricting unlimited food access (RF) to several hours in the middle of the light cycle, which is a time of day when rodents are not normally active. We compared this model to calorie restriction (CR), giving the mice 60% of their normal daily calorie intake at the same time each day. Measurement of body temperature and home cage behaviors suggests that the RF and CR models are very similar but CR has the advantage of a clearly defined food intake and more stable mean body temperature. Using the CR model, we then attempted to verify the published result that orexin deletion diminishes food anticipatory activity (FAA) but observed little to no diminution in the response to CR and, surprisingly, that orexin KO mice are refractory to body weight loss on a CR diet. Next we tested the orexigenic neuropeptide Y (NPY) and ghrelin and the anorexigenic hormone, leptin, using mouse mutants. NPY deletion did not alter the behavior or physiological response to CR. Leptin deletion impaired FAA in terms of some activity measures, such as walking and rearing, but did not substantially diminish hanging behavior preceding feeding time, suggesting that leptin knockout mice do anticipate daily meal time but do not manifest the full spectrum of activities that typify FAA. Ghrelin knockout mice do not have impaired FAA on a CR diet. Collectively, these results suggest that the individual hormones and neuropepetides tested do not regulate FAA by acting individually but this does not rule out the possibility of their concerted action in mediating FAA.

Additional Information

© 2011 Gunapala et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Received September 29, 2010; Accepted March 4, 2011; Published March 28, 2011. Editor: Shin Yamazaki, Vanderbilt University, United States of America. Funding: These studies were funded by the Broad Fellow Program in Brain Circuitry at Caltech, the Ellison Medical Foundation, and the Klarman Family Foundation Grants Program in Eating Disorders Research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank Jorge Mata for animal husbandry; Dr. Karen Lencioni, Dr. Janet Baer, and Amanda Updike for implantation of the ibutton devices; Alex Paul for assistance with experiments; and Ralph Mistlberger for editing the manuscript. Author Contributions: Conceived and designed the experiments: KMG CTH ADS. Performed the experiments: KMG CMG CTH ADS. Analyzed the data: KMG CMG CTH ADS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KMG CMG CTH ADS. Wrote the paper: KMG CMG CTH ADS.

Attached Files

Published - Gunapala2011p13643PLoS_ONE.pdf

Files

Gunapala2011p13643PLoS_ONE.pdf
Files (1.8 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:c88b545bb3a958415fef217df8e4db5d
1.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 23, 2023