Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published December 2010 | Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

Source Mechanism and Rupture Directivity of the 18 May 2009 M_W 4.6 Inglewood, California, Earthquake

Abstract

On 18 May 2009, an M_w 4.6 earthquake occurred beneath Inglewood, California, and was widely felt. Though source mechanism and its location suggest that the Newport–Inglewood fault (NIF) may be involved in generating the earthquake, rupture directivity must be modeled to establish the connection between the fault and the earthquake. We first invert for the event's source mechanism and depth with the cut-and-paste method in the long-period band (>5 s). Because of the low velocity shallow sediments in the Los Angeles (LA) basin, we use two velocity models in the inversion for stations inside and outside the LA basin. However, little difference is observed in the resolved source mechanism (M_w 4.6, strike 246°/145°, dip 50°/77°, rake 17°/138°) and depth (7 to ~9 km), compared to an inversion using the standard southern Calfornia model. With the resolved source parameters, we calibrate the amplitude anomaly of the short-period (0.5–2 Hz) P waves with amplitude adjustment factors (AAF). These AAFs are used as corrections when retrieving source mechanisms of the smaller aftershocks using short-period P waves alone. Most of the aftershocks show similar source mechanisms as that of the mainshock, providing ideal empirical Green's functions (EGFs) for studying its rupture process. We use a forward modeling approach to retrieve rupture directivity of the mainshock, consistent with movement on the NIF with rupture toward the southeast. Although we focus on P waves for analyzing rupture directivity, the resolved unilateral pattern is also confirmed with the azimuthal variation of the duration of SH waves observed in the basin. The high rupture velocity near the shear velocity and relatively low stress drop are consistent with the hypothesis of rupture on a mature fault.

Additional Information

© 2010 Seismological Society of America. Manuscript received 5 April 2010. Supported by the Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) Key Laboratory of Dynamic Geodesy CAS fund kzcx2-yw-116-01, the Institute of Earth Science funding 02092410, China Earthquake Administration funding 200808078, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Award No. G09AP00082, and Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) Award No. 119938. Data were obtained via the Seismic Transfer Program from the Southern California Earthquake Data Center. Discussion with Hiroo Kanamori helped improve the manuscript. This research was supported by the SCEC, which is funded by National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement EAR-0529922 and USGS Cooperative Agreement 07HQAG0008. The SCEC contribution number for this paper is 1439; it is Contribution No. 10041, Seismological Laboratory, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology.

Attached Files

Published - Luo2010p12307B_Seismol_Soc_Am.pdf

Supplemental Material - Figure_S1.jpg

Supplemental Material - Figure_S2.jpg

Supplemental Material - Figure_S3.jpg

Supplemental Material - Figure_S4.jpg

Supplemental Material - Figure_S5.jpg

Files

Luo2010p12307B_Seismol_Soc_Am.pdf
Files (2.9 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:4f1c2125c107f92b71b2498d55ad1e00
1.8 MB Preview Download
md5:5ffaf98e9f3619b4a7b395fdb6cea008
214.3 kB Preview Download
md5:7b8e6904e62578ad028ecf0ee6444e79
133.0 kB Preview Download
md5:904ba8f277d786f303b1c4412108ddc6
73.9 kB Preview Download
md5:669291cf378f78cf0965cfabd6c7acc4
189.1 kB Preview Download
md5:f00d46987b4560a437278f5c5a90b336
342.6 kB Preview Download
md5:c6c4c27a5d5bdc36b302d53c2f1dd148
96.9 kB Preview Download
md5:0d202d3614fe4651b1ff4024b89a38bb
12.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 21, 2023