Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published July 15, 2010 | Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

Object preference by walking fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, is mediated by vision and graviperception

Abstract

Walking fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, use visual information to orient towards salient objects in their environment, presumably as a search strategy for finding food, shelter or other resources. Less is known, however, about the role of vision or other sensory modalities such as mechanoreception in the evaluation of objects once they have been reached. To study the role of vision and mechanoreception in exploration behavior, we developed a large arena in which we could track individual fruit flies as they walked through either simple or more topologically complex landscapes. When exploring a simple, flat environment lacking three-dimensional objects, flies used visual cues from the distant background to stabilize their walking trajectories. When exploring an arena containing an array of cones, differing in geometry, flies actively oriented towards, climbed onto, and explored the objects, spending most of their time on the tallest, steepest object. A fly's behavioral response to the geometry of an object depended upon the intrinsic properties of each object and not a relative assessment to other nearby objects. Furthermore, the preference was not due to a greater attraction towards tall, steep objects, but rather a change in locomotor behavior once a fly reached and explored the surface. Specifically, flies are much more likely to stop walking for long periods when they are perched on tall, steep objects. Both the vision system and the antennal chordotonal organs (Johnston's organs) provide sufficient information about the geometry of an object to elicit the observed change in locomotor behavior. Only when both these sensory systems were impaired did flies not show the behavioral preference for the tall, steep objects.

Additional Information

© 2010 Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd. Accepted 7 April 2010. The authors thank Kristin Branson for her discussions of behavioral analysis, as well as Martin Peek and Neil Halelamien for their help developing the first version of the arena and tracking software. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01DA022777-04; A.R.), and the National Science Foundation (0623527) to M.H.D. Deposited in PMC for release after 12 months.

Attached Files

Published - Robie2010p10646J_Exp_Biol.pdf

Supplemental Material - 0471749FigS1.jpg

Supplemental Material - 0471749FigS2.jpg

Supplemental Material - Movie1.mov

Supplemental Material - Movie2.mov

Files

0471749FigS2.jpg
Files (5.2 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:0b7344c3b24148d54e3881fd24d5f250
1.4 MB Download
md5:a17002d0cd52c3c3c13a08882d99cb56
44.1 kB Preview Download
md5:fab8ee590645b1b6a21f593bd10ad09e
1.1 MB Download
md5:3394898f193fd9662ac14e860557ebb8
25.6 kB Preview Download
md5:c3e496fdbe4b7bac3b03685b6123c7db
64.5 kB Preview Download
md5:bc880d2bae4b13bdbd44e366226a500e
5.1 kB Preview Download
md5:b695f598762777697364a344e4cff5f3
2.5 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023