Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published December 9, 2009 | Published
Journal Article Open

Sub-Optimal Allocation of Time in Sequential Movements

Abstract

The allocation of limited resources such as time or energy is a core problem that organisms face when planning complex actions. Most previous research concerning planning of movement has focused on the planning of single, isolated movements. Here we investigated the allocation of time in a pointing task where human subjects attempted to touch two targets in a specified order to earn monetary rewards. Subjects were required to complete both movements within a limited time but could freely allocate the available time between the movements. The time constraint presents an allocation problem to the subjects: the more time spent on one movement, the less time is available for the other. In different conditions we assigned different rewards to the two tokens. How the subject allocated time between movements affected their expected gain on each trial. We also varied the angle between the first and second movements and the length of the second movement. Based on our results, we developed and tested a model of speed-accuracy tradeoff for sequential movements. Using this model we could predict the time allocation that would maximize the expected gain of each subject in each experimental condition. We compared human performance with predicted optimal performance. We found that all subjects allocated time sub-optimally, spending more time than they should on the first movement even when the reward of the second target was five times larger than the first. We conclude that the movement planning system fails to maximize expected reward in planning sequences of as few as two movements and discuss possible interpretations drawn from economic theory.

Additional Information

© 2009 Wu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Received September 30, 2009; accepted November 12, 2009; published December 9, 2009. Funding: Supported by NIH EY08266. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Author contributions: Conceived and designed the experiments: SWW MFDM LTM. Performed the experiments: SWW. Analyzed the data: SWW LTM. Wrote the paper: SWW MFDM LTM. Editor: Edward Vul, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States of America. We thank David Rosenbaum for comments on an earlier draft.

Attached Files

Published - Wu2009p6727PLoS_ONE.pdf

Files

Wu2009p6727PLoS_ONE.pdf
Files (661.5 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:bedd06988afc04b5374d8f09d7a2da0a
661.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 19, 2023