Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published October 21, 2009 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Nonlinear Integration of Visual and Haltere Inputs in Fly Neck Motor Neurons

Abstract

Animals use information from multiple sensory organs to generate appropriate behavior. Exactly how these different sensory inputs are fused at the motor system is not well understood. Here we study how fly neck motor neurons integrate information from two well characterized sensory systems: visual information from the compound eye and gyroscopic information from the mechanosensory halteres. Extracellular recordings reveal that a subpopulation of neck motor neurons display "gating-like" behavior: they do not fire action potentials in response to visual stimuli alone but will do so if the halteres are coactivated. Intracellular recordings show that these motor neurons receive small, sustained subthreshold visual inputs in addition to larger inputs that are phase locked to haltere movements. Our results suggest that the nonlinear gating-like effect results from summation of these two inputs with the action potential threshold providing the nonlinearity. As a result of this summation, the sustained visual depolarization is transformed into a temporally structured train of action potentials synchronized to the haltere beating movements. This simple mechanism efficiently fuses two different sensory signals and may also explain the context-dependent effects of visual inputs on fly behavior.

Additional Information

© 2009 Society for Neuroscience. Received June 19, 2009; revised Aug. 21, 2009; accepted Aug. 29, 2009. S.J.H. was supported by a Medical Research Council Ph.D. Studentship. H.G.K. was supported by the Royal Society and by European Office of Aerospace Research and Development Grant FW8655-05-1-3066. We thank J. Niven, T. Matheson, S. Laughlin, K. Longden, and M. Parsons for helpful discussions. We are especially thankful to S. Rogers for providing help both with statistics and with setting up the intracellular electrophysiology. Two anonymous referees provided suggestions that improved this manuscript.

Attached Files

Published - Huston2009p6212J_Neurosci.pdf

Supplemental Material - Huston2009p6212J_Neurosci_figure_1.pdf

Supplemental Material - Huston2009p6212J_Neurosci_figure_2.pdf

Supplemental Material - Huston2009p6212J_Neurosci_figure_3.pdf

Supplemental Material - Huston2009p6212J_Neurosci_figure_4.pdf

Supplemental Material - Huston2009p6212J_Neurosci_figure_5.pdf

Supplemental Material - Huston2009p6212J_Neurosci_legend.pdf

Files

Huston2009p6212J_Neurosci_figure_1.pdf
Files (4.1 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:7fd62e7b44eacefa0f62eca13732b130
469.6 kB Preview Download
md5:3a519f0e5d68f5e03b149207c468c6bd
21.9 kB Preview Download
md5:e776b890107f36812b41f26f7cba1ed3
896.3 kB Preview Download
md5:926b96cbd59927b38ef804a48ce44271
617.9 kB Preview Download
md5:a3ef8c51af7fbebeb94ab119756590ae
131.0 kB Preview Download
md5:52b4c0d51ea7e6a6c64972ee806bad40
1.4 MB Preview Download
md5:541da5edf48cb125266c597dc3ff0c77
511.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 19, 2023