Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published November 2005 | Published
Journal Article Open

Earthquake nucleation on (aging) rate and state faults

Abstract

We obtain quasi-static, two-dimensional solutions for earthquake nucleation on faults obeying Dieterich's "aging" version of the rate and state friction equations. Two distinct nucleation regimes are found, separated by roughly a/b ∼ 0.5, where a and b are the constitutive parameters relating changes in slip rate V and state θ to frictional strength. When fault healing is unimportant (Vθ/D_c ≫ 1, where D_c is the characteristic slip distance for the evolution of θ), the nucleation zone spontaneously evolves toward a state of accelerating slip on a patch of fixed half length L_ν ≈ 1.3774(μ′D_c /bσ), where μ′ is the intrinsic stiffness of the medium and σ is the normal stress. This is the fixed length solution for which the stress intensity factor K = 0. Although this solution does not depend upon a/b explicitly, only for a/b < 0.3781 does healing remain unimportant as instability is approached. For a/b ≳ 0.5 and a wide range of slow loading conditions, Vθ/D_c ultimately approaches a quasi-constant value near 1, and the nucleation zone takes on the appearance of an expanding slip-weakening crack. A fracture energy balance indicates that in this regime the nucleation length asymptotically approaches π−1[b/(b − a)]2(μ′D_c /bσ), a result that is consistent with the numerical simulations despite considerable complexity asa approaches b. This suggests that nucleation lengths can sometimes be much larger than those found by Dieterich (e.g., by a factor of 100 for a/b = 0.95). For surfaces this close to velocity neutral, nucleation might produce signals detectable by surface seismometers for values of D_c at the upper end of the lab range (100 μm). However, the attributes of the aging law that give rise to such large nucleation lengths may be nonphysical; additional laboratory experiments are needed to address this issue.

Additional Information

©2009. American Geophysical Union. Received 11 February 2005; accepted 31 August 2005; published 29 November 2005. We thank Alain Cochard for providing us with notes on the numerical solution of the governing equations and his elastodynamic code used to check our radiation damping solutions, Jim Rice for reminding us what self-similarity really means, and Nadia Lapusta for advice on notation. This paper benefited from comments by two quasi-anonymous reviewers and the associate editor. Supported by NSF award EAR-0126184.

Attached Files

Published - RUBjgrb05.pdf

Files

RUBjgrb05.pdf
Files (2.7 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:07f37a57428ec9649818fab32fd42d76
2.7 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 22, 2023
Modified:
October 19, 2023