Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published February 21, 2009 | Published
Journal Article Open

Southern San Andreas-San Jacinto fault system slip rates estimated from earthquake cycle models constrained by GPS and interferometric synthetic aperture radar observations

Abstract

We use ground geodetic and interferometric synthetic aperture radar satellite observations across the southern San Andreas (SAF)-San Jacinto (SJF) fault systems to constrain their slip rates and the viscosity structure of the lower crust and upper mantle on the basis of periodic earthquake cycle, Maxwell viscoelastic, finite element models. Key questions for this system are the SAF and SJF slip rates, the slip partitioning between the two main branches of the SJF, and the dip of the SAF. The best-fitting models generally have a high-viscosity lower crust (η = 10^(21) Pa s) overlying a lower-viscosity upper mantle (η = 10^(19) Pa s). We find considerable trade-offs between the relative time into the current earthquake cycle of the San Jacinto fault and the upper mantle viscosity. With reasonable assumptions for the relative time in the earthquake cycle, the partition of slip is fairly robust at around 24–26 mm/a for the San Jacinto fault system and 16–18 mm/a for the San Andreas fault. Models for two subprofiles across the SAF-SJF systems suggest that slip may transfer from the western (Coyote Creek) branch to the eastern (Clark-Superstition hills) branch of the SJF from NW to SE. Across the entire system our best-fitting model gives slip rates of 2 ± 3, 12 ± 9, 12 ± 9, and 17 ± 3 mm/a for the Elsinore, Coyote Creek, Clark, and San Andreas faults, respectively, where the large uncertainties in the slip rates for the SJF branches reflect the large uncertainty in the slip rate partitioning within the SJF system.

Additional Information

© 2009 American Geophysical Union. Received 7 August 2008; revised 1 December 2008; accepted 15 December 2008; published 21 February 2009. We thank the European Space Agency for ERS data provided through theWInSAR archive. CMM3data were provided through the Southern California Earthquake Center.Maps and profiles in this paper were generated using the public domain Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) software [Wessel and Smith, 1995]. We greatly appreciate thorough and insightful reviews by Noah Fay, one anonymous reviewer, and associate editor Tim Dixon. E.A.H. thanks the Tectonics Observatory and the Seismological Laboratory, Caltech, for postdoctoral support. This research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and funded through the internal Research and Technology Development program.

Attached Files

Published - Lundgren2009p10210.10292008JB005996.pdf

Files

Lundgren2009p10210.10292008JB005996.pdf
Files (24.7 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:592fdb28d7e73e1a04ac5ec7ec8e49bb
24.7 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 21, 2023
Modified:
October 19, 2023