Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published March 25, 2009 | Published
Journal Article Open

How choice reveals and shapes expected hedonic outcome

Abstract

Humans tend to modify their attitudes to align with past action. For example, after choosing between similarly valued alternatives, people rate the selected option as better than they originally did, and the rejected option as worse. However, it is unknown whether these modifications in evaluation reflect an underlying change in the physiological representation of a stimulus' expected hedonic value and our emotional response to it. Here, we addressed this question by combining participants' estimations of the pleasure they will derive from future events, with brain imaging data recorded while they imagined those events, both before, and after, choosing between them. Participants rated the selected alternatives as better after the decision stage relative to before, whereas discarded alternatives were valued less. Our functional magnetic resonance imaging findings reveal that postchoice changes in preference are tracked in caudate nucleus activity. Specifically, the difference in blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal associated with the selected and rejected stimuli was enhanced after a decision was taken, reflecting the choice that had just been made. This finding suggests that the physiological representation of a stimulus' expected hedonic value is altered by a commitment to it. Furthermore, before any revaluation induced by the decision process, our data show that BOLD signal in this same region reflects the choices we are likely to make at a later time.

Additional Information

© 2009 Society for Neuroscience. Received Oct. 15, 2008; revised Dec. 9, 2008; accepted Dec. 27, 2008. This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Programme Grant to R.J.D. and a British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship to T.S. We thank J. McDermott for programming and discussion; G. Flandin for assistance with programming and analysis; K. Friston for advice on design and analysis; and P. Dayan, E. Phelps, S. Fleming, B. Strange, and P. Bossaerts for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Attached Files

Published - Sharot2009p1339J_Neurosci.pdf

Files

Sharot2009p1339J_Neurosci.pdf
Files (170.0 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:1f9419e8fa7e8a4db8e49944a10c5947
170.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 20, 2023
Modified:
October 18, 2023